Gujarat, Delhi tops the list for public order disobedience: NCRB data

While Delhi leads the pack with a staggering 36,980 cases, Gujarat follows close behind with a concerning 12,229 instances of flouting official directives aimed at maintaining peace and order.

Advertisement

Ahmedabad : In a worrying trend that casts a shadow over public safety, Delhi and Gujarat have emerged as the top contenders in disobeying direct orders of public officers, according to the latest National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) reports.

While Delhi leads the pack with a staggering 36,980 cases, Gujarat follows close behind with a concerning 12,229 instances of flouting official directives aimed at maintaining peace and order.

These violations fall under Section 188 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), which empowers public servants to enforce obedience to their orders and prescribes penalties for non-compliance.

As Advocate Aum Kotwal aptly points out, “Intentional disregard of the law, even without specific intent to harm, is punishable. Mere awareness of the order and the subsequent act of disobedience, if likely to cause harm, is sufficient to warrant action.”

The consequences of disregarding Section 188 can vary depending on the severity of the offense. A simple act of disobedience can lead to a month in jail and a fine of up to Rs. 200. However, if the disobedience poses a threat to life, health, or public order, the penalty can escalate to six months imprisonment and a Rs. 1,000 fine, or even both.

The sheer volume of cases in both Delhi and Gujarat raises concerns about the effectiveness of law enforcement and the general respect for public order in these bustling urban centers. The question arises: why are residents of these cities so blatantly disregarding official directives? Are awareness campaigns lacking? Is enforcement lax? Or are deeper societal factors at play?

Possible explanations range from a lack of awareness about Section 188 and its consequences to a general disregard for authority figures. Socioeconomic factors, cultural attitudes towards law enforcement, and the nature of the directives themselves could also contribute to this trend.

“Addressing this issue requires a multi-pronged approach. Increased public awareness campaigns about Section 188 and its importance for public safety are crucial” said Sharad Kapadia, president of Surat Citizen Council Trust (SCCT). “ Effective enforcement by authorities is essential, ensuring consistency and fairness in applying the law. Additionally, addressing the underlying societal factors that may be contributing to the problem, such as poverty and lack of trust in institutions, is also vital.”

Advertisement