Saurashtra Uni M.Com Rules: BBA Grads Face Hurdles
Rajkot, Gujarat – Saurashtra University is once again embroiled in a major controversy, this time over a contentious new circular imposing stringent and allegedly “harmful” conditions for...
Rajkot, Gujarat – Saurashtra University is once again embroiled in a major controversy, this time over a contentious new circular imposing stringent and allegedly “harmful” conditions for BBA graduates seeking admission to its M.Com program. The university’s decision, which dictates that such students will not be considered to have a “good academic record” for future jobs, nor be eligible for crucial TET-TAT examinations for teaching positions after B.Ed, has ignited a fierce backlash from academic circles and political figures alike. Critics are slamming the move as detrimental to students’ future prospects, demanding the immediate withdrawal of the circular.
“This circular is absolutely absurd and will severely harm the career prospects of countless students,” declared Dr. Nidat Barot, Gujarat Pradesh Congress Spokesperson and Dean of the University’s Education Faculty, in a scathing critique. Dr. Barot has lodged a written representation with the Vice Chancellor, urging him to revoke the contentious directive.
The circular, issued by Saurashtra University’s Registrar Dr. Ramesh Parmar, states that, with the Vice Chancellor’s approval pending ratification by authorities, BBA students can be admitted to M.Com under strict new rules. These rules are:
The student will not be considered to have a good academic record.
In the future, where graduation and post-graduation are to be considered consecutively, they will not be entitled to a job.
A student will not be eligible for TET and TAT exams for teaching assistants after passing B.Ed.
Dr. Barot minced no words in his condemnation, highlighting the inherent contradictions and potential injustices of these conditions. “Saurashtra University gives admission, Saurashtra University conducts the exams, a student can even earn a gold medal, and yet their academic record won’t be considered ‘good’? On what basis are we deciding this?” he questioned, addressing the first condition. “This is fundamentally illogical.”
His criticism intensified regarding the second condition, which arbitrarily restricts future employment opportunities. “The employer decides which degree holders to give jobs to. How can we, by imposing a university condition, declare that they will not be entitled to jobs?” Dr. Barot argued, emphasizing the university’s overreach.
The third condition, affecting eligibility for teaching exams, drew particular ire. “The State Examination Board, State Government, and Commissioner of Schools are the authorities that decide who is eligible for TET and TAT. This condition is completely inappropriate and an encroachment on their domain,” Dr. Barot asserted, underscoring the potential for widespread harm to aspiring teachers. “I have demanded that the Vice Chancellor’s decision be reconsidered by the competent authority, so students are not harmed in the future and are not given admission under wrong, conditional terms, but unconditionally.”
Dr. Barot’s written submission to Saurashtra University Vice Chancellor Dr. Utpal Joshi explicitly laid out his objections to each condition, arguing that the university is exceeding its authority and creating unnecessary hurdles for students. He pointed out that the State Government has constituted various authorities through the Act Statute and has granted them powers in such important policy matters.
He urged that the decision, if approved by the Board of Deans, Academic Council, and Board of Management, should be thoroughly discussed to ensure appropriate decisions are taken. Dr. Barot’s representation specifically requested that the implementation of this circular be suspended immediately and placed before the competent authority for thorough discussion and approval.
“Your special authority and ratification should be exercised only where necessary, not to impose conditions that undermine a student’s entire future,” he concluded, making a powerful plea for student welfare. The unfolding controversy has placed a spotlight on the university’s decision-making processes and the potential impact on thousands of students’ academic and professional journeys.
