Gujarat : Asaram Bapu Challenges 10-Year Sentence Amid Legal Wrangling
saram's lawyers, Ashish Dagli and I.H. Syed, portrayed their client as a frail octogenarian battling illness and the weight of delayed justice. They underscored the challenge of gathering evidence 12 years after the alleged incident, emphasizing the passing of a key witness, the cook, whose statement under CRPC 164 now remains unverifiable.
Ahmedabad : The legal saga of Asaram Bapu, spanning over a decade, continues to captivate attention as the self-proclaimed spiritual leader challenges his 10-year jail term on rape charges. With his legal team invoking his advanced age and citing procedural irregularities, Asaram Bapu’s bid for freedom unfolds against a backdrop of controversy and public scrutiny.
In a dramatic courtroom scene, Asaram’s lawyers, Ashish Dagli and I.H. Syed, portrayed their client as a frail octogenarian battling illness and the weight of delayed justice. They underscored the challenge of gathering evidence 12 years after the alleged incident, emphasizing the passing of a key witness, the cook, whose statement under CRPC 164 now remains unverifiable.
The Gujarat High Court’s rejection of bail applications, including one filed by Asaram’s son, Narayan Sai, adds layers to the narrative. Asaram’s confinement in Rajasthan’s Jodhpur jail since 2018, coupled with the court’s permission for medical treatment in Mumbai under police supervision, paints a picture of a once-influential figure now grappling with legal entanglements and health concerns.
At the heart of Asaram’s legal woes lies the 2013 Surat rape case, where he faced a litany of charges including rape, unnatural offenses, and criminal intimidation. The Sessions Court of Gandhinagar dealt the final blow last year, sentencing Asaram to life imprisonment, a verdict that sent shockwaves through his devotees and critics alike.
Despite the gravity of the charges, Asaram’s defense team maintains its stance, highlighting the purported lack of evidence tying their client to the crime. They emphasize the acquittal of six co-accused, painting a picture of a selective prosecution targeting their client, while casting doubts on the credibility of the victim’s delayed complaint and the integrity of the legal process.
The genesis of the case traces back to a brave survivor from Surat, whose complaint against Asaram rocked the nation’s consciousness. Her courage in confronting a figure once revered as a spiritual guide shines a light on the enduring struggle for justice against powerful perpetrators.
Asaram’s legal odyssey serves as a cautionary tale, prompting reflection on the complexities of navigating the legal system, the pursuit of accountability, and the resilience of those who dare to speak truth to power. As the courtroom drama unfolds, the verdict on Asaram’s fate remains uncertain, but the broader questions surrounding justice and accountability endure, resonating far beyond the confines of a single case.