Surat Farmers Protest Power Line Route Change Amid Corruption Allegations
SURAT : A growing storm of anger is brewing in Surat district as farmers have accused Gujarat Power Grid Transmission Limited of abruptly changing the route of a high-tension electricity line...
SURAT : A growing storm of anger is brewing in Surat district as farmers have accused Gujarat Power Grid Transmission Limited of abruptly changing the route of a high-tension electricity line project, raising serious allegations of irregularities, lack of transparency and possible vested interests influencing the decision.
The controversy traces back to May 7, 2025, when 20 farmers from Sewani village in Kamrej taluka were officially served notices through the District Collector regarding the proposed transmission line route. A legal hearing was conducted, objections were recorded, and the route was finalised after due process, according to the farmers.
However, nearly a year later, farmers say the situation has taken a shocking turn. Several land parcels mentioned in the earlier notices have reportedly been converted to non-agricultural (NA) status, and the previously approved route has been altered without clear justification. Instead of the original landowners, notices dated June 25, 2026, have now been issued to six different farmers.
“This is not just a technical change, it is a complete breakdown of transparency,” said farmer leader Darshan Naik. “After all legal hearings were completed and objections were recorded, suddenly changing the route raises serious suspicion. Farmers deserve to know who benefited from this decision.”
The Gujarat Farmers’ Association submitted a formal representation to the Surat District Collector on June 30, demanding full disclosure of the reasons behind the route change. They have also called for details of the officials or committees responsible for approving the modification.
Farmers have demanded a high-level independent investigation into whether any political, personal or financial interests influenced the revised alignment. They have further sought suspension of work on the disputed route until the inquiry is completed.
The association has also insisted that file notes, technical reports and approval documents related to the decision be made public to ensure accountability.
Naik warned that such opaque changes directly impact agricultural land, livelihoods and long-term rural stability. “If wrongdoing is proven, strict legal action must be taken against all responsible officials and beneficiaries,” he added.




