Diamond Merchant Turned Financer Akshit Jain Accused of Swapping Genuine Gold for Fake, Facing Arrest
Akshit Jain alias Prinshu Shah Jivan Jain, a well-known name in Surat's business circles and resident of Hitech Avenue in Vesu, is currently under scrutiny after allegations of fraudulent activity emerged against him. The Mahidharpura police have initiated action against Jain following a complaint lodged by Sonal Kutchi, a resident of Green Paradise on Bhesan road in Surat.
Surat : Akshit Jain, a prominent figure in the diamond trading and private financing industry in Surat, finds himself embroiled in a legal battle as allegations surface of him duping a woman by substituting her genuine gold with counterfeit items.
Mahidharpura police have launched an investigation into the case, following a complaint filed by Sonal Kutchi, who accused Jain of deceitfully exchanging her original gold chain with a fake one. The incident sheds light on the risks associated with informal lending practices and the need for stringent regulations to protect borrowers from financial exploitation.
Akshit Jain alias Prinshu Shah Jivan Jain, a well-known name in Surat’s business circles and resident of Hitech Avenue in Vesu, is currently under scrutiny after allegations of fraudulent activity emerged against him. The Mahidharpura police have initiated action against Jain following a complaint lodged by Sonal Kutchi, a resident of Green Paradise on Bhesan road in Surat.
According to police sources, Kutchi had approached Jain seeking financial assistance amounting to Rs 50,000 to facilitate the purchase of a house. Jain, who operates both as a diamond merchant and a private financer, demanded security in the form of gold jewelry in exchange for the loan. Obliging Jain’s terms, Kutchi submitted a gold chain, a one-gram gold biscuit, and two gold earrings as collateral, agreeing to a monthly interest rate of 1.5%.
Over the course of her dealings with Jain, Kutchi diligently repaid the interest on her loan. However, upon learning of alternative borrowing options with lower interest rates, she decided to retrieve her deposited valuables from Jain’s possession. It was during this process that she discovered discrepancies in the gold items provided by Jain.
Upon examination at a bank where Kutchi intended to leverage her gold assets for a loan, it was revealed that the gold chain submitted by her was counterfeit, and there were inconsistencies in the weight of other gold articles. Feeling deceived and defrauded, Kutchi promptly filed a complaint with the Mahidharpura police, accusing Jain of swapping her genuine gold with fake substitutes and tampering with the weight of the gold biscuit.
The case has been registered under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code and Gujarat Money Lenders Act 2011 section 40, 41, 42(K) for cheating, and an investigation is currently underway to apprehend Jain and uncover further evidence related to the alleged fraud. Jain’s dual roles as a diamond merchant and a private financer have come under scrutiny, raising concerns about the integrity of informal lending practices and the need for enhanced consumer protection measures.
In light of this incident, authorities emphasize the importance of exercising caution while engaging in financial transactions, especially with unregulated lenders. Additionally, calls for stricter oversight and regulation within the private financing sector have gained momentum, with stakeholders advocating for measures to safeguard the interests of borrowers and prevent instances of exploitation and fraud.
As the investigation progresses, the case serves as a stark reminder of the risks inherent in informal financial arrangements and the imperative for greater transparency and accountability in the lending industry.